LayneBracy wrote:Alaska's maps have 100-ft contours, correct? Will you still try to make a P300 list? That would seem difficult, since every interpolated P300 would be an error range peak and every P200 would be soft-ranked(if you allow that a peak could be as high as the next higher contour).
Closed Contours | Int Peak | Int Saddle | Int Prom | Min Elev | Max Elev | Min Saddle | Max Saddle | Max Prom | Min Prom |
4 | 4950 | 4550 | 400 | 4900 | 4999 | 4500 | 4599 | 499 | 301 |
3 | 4850 | 4550 | 300 | 4800 | 4899 | 4500 | 4599 | 399 | 201 |
2 | 4750 | 4550 | 200 | 4700 | 4799 | 4500 | 4599 | 299 | 101 |
LayneBracy wrote:What I am getting at is that when a peak elevation is the same as a contour level, the contour line for the summit elevation is sometimes shown, sometimes not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests