1)Is Bartlett the 13er that had its top mined off? I noticed that John's lists has it 155' lower than Gerry's!
2)The ranked 13er list is certainly an approximation - I doubt we can really know that Mount Buckskin of the Tenmile Range is one foot higher than Vestal Peak in the San Juans, for example. It's probably 50/50 that Vestal is actually higher. However, we use the best data available.
So, how about giving 13ers that we list as having the same elevation the same rank? Teresa Gergen refers to 202 bicentennials. This makes sense if we give all 5 peaks with height 13580 as rank 198, instead of 198-202. It seems that ties are currently broken by alphabetical order. In this method, that segment of the list would read:
196 13581 Mount Emma
196 13581 Pt 13581
198 13580 Clark Pk
198 13580 Pt 13580 A
198 13580 Pt 13580 B
198 13580 Mt Powell
198 13580 Twin Peaks A
203 13579 Chiefs Head Pk
Any thoughts?