most climbed CO 13ers

[DSunwall]

most climbed CO 13ers.

John, I just noticed this list on the Colorado 13ers page. Curious though why Wheeler Peak in NM is at the top of a Colorado list. also it shows 53 climbers but I count only 38.

[John Kirk]

Try it now - this is a case of updating the database schema and not the script that uses it. I combined all data into one table so that peaks need to be checked only once to be done on all lists without messy union/subselects. Neglected to change the script to specify the state.

[DSunwall]

thats better, I havn't climded the most climbed 13er, james peak, saving it for..... sometime.

[RyanSchilling]

I must be a conformist or something. If I counted right, I've climbed every one of these save two.

[John Kirk]

Even worse for me - I've done them all.

[Layne Bracy]

I've done 19/25, but only 2 of the top 5. The six I have left are all centennials, so I'll probably get them sooner or later....

Say, I wonder what the list of least climbed 13ers looks like?

(hint hint)

[John Kirk]

Say, I wonder what the list of least climbed 13ers looks like?

(hint hint)

50 least:
http://listsofjohn.com/Colorado/13ERSLC.php
None for me.

Beefed up the Most to 50 as well. Missing 2 of those.
http://listsofjohn.com/Colorado/13ERSMC.php

[DSunwall]

John, the title for the most climbed 13ers, now says least climbed.

so how do you all know so quickly how many of these lists you have done? memory? I must need to add a few gigabytes.
just from memory I would say I have none of the least climbed.
and have not climbed 14 of the most climbed.

[Layne Bracy]

Nice, John.

37/50 and 0/50 for me.

The hard thing about climbing the least climbed peaks is that climbing them may knock them off the list!

[John Kirk]

The hard thing about climbing the least climbed peaks is that climbing them may knock them off the list!

Yes - for every least climbed peak you climb there's likely a new contender afterward. A truly dynamic list; or a list from hell from a completion standpoint?

Guess you gotta do them all to be sure any claim holds over time.

[Ryan Kowalski]

Kind of an interesting list: I'm at 42/50 and 0/50. That last number is kind of embarassing.....maybe I'll purposefully go after a few of these just to make myself feel better.

[MikeRodenak]

The hard thing about climbing the least climbed peaks is that climbing them may knock them off the list!

Yes - for every least climbed peak you climb there's likely a new contender afterward. A truly dynamic list; or a list from hell from a completion standpoint?

Guess you gotta do them all to be sure any claim holds over time.

I actually had that happen to me, I was the 8th person to sign the LOJ log for Peak X and dropped it off the list!

[glodder]

Hilarious discussion, guys! I laughed out loud in my office when I read Layne's comment about a peak getting knocked off the least-climbed list. Definitely ever-changing...

Todd

[Layne Bracy]

Ahhhh......good times.

A year later, I'm up to 41/50 MOST and holding strong at 0/50 LEAST!

[glodder]

Yeah, sorry about my response a year later. It's been a while since I've visited the site and I'm just getting back into reading a lot of the threads. I was perusing through and saw this one which I thought was great...

As long as no one else climbs those least-climbed peaks, maybe someday you'll climb one that stays on the list, and finally reach 1/50!!!

Todd